I think Facebook are using a new style of banning. Total blacklisting. & k9 t( `3 a) S l j) n, G
我认为FB正在使用一种新的方式进行封禁。也就是永久（完全）黑名单。/ k. x6 {, U" j# H4 p2 m: y
Instant Policy Violation on any account launched by an account in any way connected to a violating account.) Y& [& @# X! S5 r) ~( U* j
任何账户在运行时通过任何方式接触了一个违规账户，就会激活违规即时反应机制。 9 M) Q# [ [9 }' Q; o2 T1 g5 \: tI've tested a huge amount of variables since yesterday and the conclusion I've come to is that its linked to the email address/domain. " b$ V& A( v* \& x( U7 }: [8 [我测试了非常多的变量直到昨天，结论是邮箱地址和链接是导致违规即时反应机制发生的原因。 / A4 n/ s/ @0 |4 i- F5 Q+ `I went as far as creating a new, separate Business Manager on a fresh, untouched account but using the same email address. Any ad launched also got hit by instant policy violation. ' e3 t6 m: D1 }# x9 S
我甚至创建了一个新的单独的BM，没有接触过任何账户只是使用同样的邮箱地址。任何广告在往上放时也被违规即时反应机制封禁了。 + |2 k3 t6 o2 V, K! ^0 sI'm up and running again using an account with no email/domain link. 5 q& D" n) d, J/ ^我在使用一个没有邮箱没有域名链接的账户。 / o: c0 j8 a+ @6 IMoral of the story is, Facebook are taking policy violations a lot more seriously and trying to stop affiliates from doing what we do. Take it one of two ways: follow the crowd to whitehat or adapt and reap the rewards of an unsaturated blackhat marketplace. - j+ U/ Y* q( R# d: x这个事情告诉我们，FB正在使违规即时反应机制变得更加严格，并且在尝试禁止和我们一样跑黑五类的affiliate。那么最终的结果可能是两种：1.大量的人会涌入正规市场2.适应整个FB的改变，去接手剩下的不饱和黑五类市场。
发表于 2017-7-31 19:01:21
楼主
发表于 2017-7-31 21:16:45
发表于 2017-8-2 10:49:18
发表于 2017-8-14 09:17:56